On Sun, 2020-01-26 at 13:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > On 1/26/20 11:34 AM, Lukas Auer wrote: > > Hi Sean, > > Usually, ret is used as a variable name here. I think it would actually > > make the code a bit nicer to read here, because the clock rate is not > > read from variable err. > > Hm, I chose err instead of ret since that variable is never the return > value of the function. I can change that for v2 if you'd like. >
Makes sense. I think it's fine to keep it as is. > > But that's just nit-picking. The patch looks good otherwise! > > > > Reviewed-by: Lukas Auer <[email protected]> > >
