Hi Andy, On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 05:30, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 1:02 PM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 1:00 AM Andy Shevchenko > > <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 6:13 PM Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > This little series adds a few checks into the code to allow better > > > > operation when booting a build from a previous-state loader such as > > > > coreboot. > > > > > > > > At present we have a 'coreboot' target, but sometimes it is useful to > > > > boot > > > > a bare-metal target, such as coral, from coreboot. That allows > > > > comparison > > > > of operation between the bare metal version doing all the init itself > > > > and > > > > relying on coreboot for some init. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for sharing. May I ask what devices and configurations you > > > have tested this on? > > > > > > P.S. I'll be able to test my case after xmas vacations (mid January). > > > > > > > Do you have any review comments to share? > > Not for time being. Sorry, I'm busy with something else, but if there > is a branch with these patches available thru x86 U-Boot tree, it will > be easier to me to have a chance to test.
This one is u-boot-dm/cor3chain-working I always push to the -dm tree before sending patches out, but don't always mention it in the cover letter! The ACPI patches are at dm/coral-working Regards, Simon
