On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:51 AM Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2/18/20 8:39 PM, Rick Chen wrote: > >>> > >>> Patch 6 and 7 shall be applied via spi tree. > >>> You mix them together, the patchwork will become complicated. > >>> It will be better for me to wait for a period of time to get the > >>> approval(Reviewed-by or Acked-by) of SPI MAINTAINER. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Rick > >> > >> So is this just waiting for approval, or is there a change I should make > >> on my end? > > > > If they are not highly dependent, you shall separate and send them > > individually. > > But we can wait for few days and see, if it still no response. > > You can consider separate them. > > These patches add support for the on-board spi flash. In the past I have > separated out some unrelated patches, and have been told to keep them in > a series where they are used.
Yes, keeping all related patch in one series help maintainers in some way. I would prefer all patches in this series go via the riscv tree. However as Rick pointed out, we do need the SPI maintainer's review comments. So Jagan, are you able to give some review? Thanks! Regards, Bin
