-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Warren 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 10:43 AM
To: Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>; 
tomcwarren3...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: tegra: rework fdt_serial_tag_setup_one

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 10:18 AM
To: Tom Warren <twar...@nvidia.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: tegra: rework fdt_serial_tag_setup_one

External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On 3/17/20 11:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 3/16/20 1:40 PM, twar...@nvidia.com wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
>>
>> Reword fdt_serial_tag_setup_one() so that the types it uses aren't 
>> tied to CONFIG_SERIAL_TAG, and rename the function to better indicate 
>> its purpose. This will allow it to be re-used by future board info 
>> related code.
>
>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/ft_board_info.c | 77
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/ft_board_info.h | 23 +++++++++++
>
> I don't think this series was based on upstream, or there are missing 
> patches in between upstream and this series; those files don't exist 
> upstream.

Oh. This patch adds those files. But the commit description says it's reworking 
some existing logic. I guess the description is from some squashed patch, and 
doesn't describe what the patch actually does? Also, the new file isn't added 
to any Makefile, and no edits are made to any other file in order to call the 
newly added functionality.
[Tom] Yeah, this got messed up when I squashed/edited the transition from 
nvtboot to cboot support files in arch/arm/mach-tegra. I'll have to revisit 
this, as the code isn't called anywhere currently in my upstream work, nor 
build by a Makefile. 
  [Tom] OK, so this work (adding board info (proc/pmu/display) is already done 
by CBoot on T210 before we get to U-Boot, so it's not needed. Mea culpa - lots 
of churn w/these patches, trying to get them squashed/optimized for 
upstreaming, and I mistakenly kept this one around from the nvtboot->U-Boot 
days. I'll drop it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain
confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to