On 3/30/20 3:34 AM, Tan, Ley Foon wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 9:29 AM >> To: Tan, Ley Foon <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>; See, Chin Liang >> <[email protected]>; Simon Goldschmidt >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm: dts: agilex: Enable QSPI >> >> On 3/30/20 3:21 AM, Tan, Ley Foon wrote: >>> >>>> On 3/27/20 9:24 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>>>> Enable QSPI for Agilex SoC devkit. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/dts/socfpga_agilex_socdk-u-boot.dtsi | 4 ++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_agilex_socdk-u-boot.dtsi >>>> b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_agilex_socdk-u-boot.dtsi >>>>> index 1908be4b8b27..241c0efab14c 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_agilex_socdk-u-boot.dtsi >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_agilex_socdk-u-boot.dtsi >>>>> @@ -37,3 +37,7 @@ >>>>> u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> +&qspi { >>>>> + status = "okay"; >>>>> +} >>>> >>>> Is this for master or next ? >>> Will it be too late for master? If yes, then for next. >> >> It's late, but if you feel adventurous and think this is gonna work fine, >> then I >> can put it into master. This is isolated to agilex, so I don't mind either >> way. > Tested on Agilex board. Master should be okay. > Thanks.
Then master it is.
