On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 7:11 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:08:12PM +0530, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote: > > > From: Srinath Mannam <[email protected]> > > > > Add support for stingray PAXB PHY controller driver. > > This driver supports maximum 8 PAXB phys using pipemux data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <[email protected]> > > --- > > Changes from v2: > > -Address review comments from Stefan Roese, > > Rearrange the include files. > > Remove dm/device.h as its included part of dm.h. > > > > Changes from v1: > > -Address review comments from Stefan Roese, > > Use GENMASK() instead of hard code value. > > Remove unwanted struct declaration. > > Get pr_err() into single line. > > > > drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 ++ > > drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/phy/phy-bcm-sr-pcie.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > The patch itself is fine but I think shows another problem. Can you > please add a patch that lists something relevant in the top-level > MAINTAINERS file and list this and all of the other drivers, etc, that > wouldn't just be listed in the board MAINATINERS file? Thanks!
I will be mainitainer going ahead. I have a plan to update top level MAINTAINER file once I push platform files. Hope this is fine. > > -- > Tom
