Hi Pragnesh, On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 6:08 PM Pragnesh Patel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Bin, Jagan > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Bin Meng <[email protected]> > >Sent: 20 April 2020 14:30 > >To: Jagan Teki <[email protected]> > >Cc: Pragnesh Patel <[email protected]>; U-Boot-Denx <u- > >[email protected]>; Atish Patra <[email protected]>; Palmer Dabbelt > ><[email protected]>; Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>; > >Troy Benjegerdes <[email protected]>; Anup Patel > ><[email protected]>; Sagar Kadam <[email protected]>; Rick Chen > ><[email protected]>; Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]>; Simon Glass > ><[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/17] clk: sifive: fu540-prci: Add clock > >initialization for > >SPL > > > >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize the > >sender and know the content is safe > > > >Hi Jagan, Pragnesh, > > > >On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:35 AM Jagan Teki <[email protected]> > >wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:37 PM Pragnesh Patel > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Set corepll, ddrpll and ethernet PLL for u-boot-spl > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Pragnesh Patel <[email protected]> > >> > --- > >> > drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c | 118 > >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c > >> > b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c index e6214cd821..3a73c2c8d1 > >> > 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c > >> > @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ > >> > #include <linux/clk/analogbits-wrpll-cln28hpc.h> > >> > #include <dt-bindings/clock/sifive-fu540-prci.h> > >> > > >> > +#define DDRCTLPLL_F 55 > >> > +#define DDRCTLPLL_Q 2 > >> > +#define MHz 1000000 > >> > + > >> > /* > >> > * EXPECTED_CLK_PARENT_COUNT: how many parent clocks this driver > >expects: > >> > * hfclk and rtcclk > >> > @@ -152,6 +156,27 @@ > >> > #define PRCI_CLKMUXSTATUSREG_TLCLKSEL_STATUS_MASK \ > >> > (0x1 << > >> > PRCI_CLKMUXSTATUSREG_TLCLKSEL_STATUS_SHIFT) > >> > > >> > +/* PROCMONCFG */ > >> > +#define PRCI_PROCMONCFG_OFFSET 0xF0 > >> > +#define PRCI_PROCMONCFG_CORE_CLOCK_SHIFT 24 > >> > +#define PRCI_PROCMONCFG_CORE_CLOCK_MASK \ > >> > + (0x1 << PRCI_PROCMONCFG_CORE_CLOCK_SHIFT) > >> > + > >> > +#define PLL_R(x) \ > >> > + ((x) << PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_DIVR_SHIFT) & > >> > +PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_DIVR_MASK #define PLL_F(x) \ > >> > + ((x) << PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_DIVF_SHIFT) & > >> > +PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_DIVF_MASK #define PLL_Q(x) \ > >> > + ((x) << PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_DIVQ_SHIFT) & > >> > +PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_DIVQ_MASK #define PLL_RANGE(x) \ > >> > + ((x) << PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_RANGE_SHIFT) & > >> > +PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_RANGE_MASK #define PLL_BYPASS(x) \ > >> > + ((x) << PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_BYPASS_SHIFT) & > >> > +PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_BYPASS_MASK #define PLL_FSE(x) \ > >> > + ((x) << PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_FSE_SHIFT) & > >> > +PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_FSE_MASK #define PLL_LOCK(x) \ > >> > + ((x) << PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_LOCK_SHIFT) & > >> > +PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_LOCK_MASK > >> > + > >> > /* > >> > * Private structures > >> > */ > >> > @@ -654,6 +679,93 @@ static int sifive_fu540_prci_disable(struct clk > >> > *clk) > >> > return pc->ops->enable_clk(pc, 0); } > >> > > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > >> > +static void corepll_init(struct udevice *dev) { > >> > + u32 v; > >> > + struct clk clock; > >> > + struct __prci_data *pd = dev_get_priv(dev); > >> > + > >> > + v = __prci_readl(pd, PRCI_CLKMUXSTATUSREG_OFFSET); > >> > + v &= PRCI_CLKMUXSTATUSREG_TLCLKSEL_STATUS_MASK; > >> > + > >> > + clock.id = PRCI_CLK_COREPLL; > >> > + > >> > + if (v) { > >> > + /* corepll 500 Mhz */ > >> > + sifive_fu540_prci_set_rate(&clock, 500UL * MHz); > >> > + } else { > >> > + /* corepll 1 Ghz */ > >> > + sifive_fu540_prci_set_rate(&clock, 1000UL * MHz); > >> > + } > >> > + > >> > + > >> > +sifive_fu540_prci_clock_enable(&__prci_init_clocks[clock.id], 1); } > >> > + > >> > +static void ddr_init(struct udevice *dev) { > >> > + u32 v; > >> > + struct clk clock; > >> > + struct __prci_data *pd = dev_get_priv(dev); > >> > + > >> > + //DDR init > >> > + u32 ddrctlmhz = > >> > + (PLL_R(0)) | > >> > + (PLL_F(DDRCTLPLL_F)) | > >> > + (PLL_Q(DDRCTLPLL_Q)) | > >> > + (PLL_RANGE(0x4)) | > >> > + (PLL_BYPASS(0)) | > >> > + (PLL_FSE(1)); > >> > + __prci_writel(ddrctlmhz, PRCI_DDRPLLCFG0_OFFSET, pd); > >> > + > >> > + clock.id = PRCI_CLK_DDRPLL; > >> > + > >> > + sifive_fu540_prci_clock_enable(&__prci_init_clocks[clock.id], 1); > >> > + > >> > + /* Release DDR reset */ > >> > + v = __prci_readl(pd, PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_OFFSET); > >> > + v |= PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_DDR_CTRL_RST_N_MASK; > >> > + __prci_writel(v, PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_OFFSET, pd); > >> > + > >> > + // HACK to get the '1 full controller clock cycle'. > >> > + asm volatile ("fence"); > >> > + v = __prci_readl(pd, PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_OFFSET); > >> > + v |= (PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_DDR_AXI_RST_N_MASK | > >> > + PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_DDR_AHB_RST_N_MASK | > >> > + PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_DDR_PHY_RST_N_MASK); > >> > + __prci_writel(v, PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_OFFSET, pd); > >> > + // HACK to get the '1 full controller clock cycle'. > >> > + asm volatile ("fence"); > >> > + > >> > + /* These take like 16 cycles to actually propagate. We can't go > >> > sending > >> > + * stuff before they come out of reset. So wait. (TODO: Add a > >> > register > >> > + * to read the current reset states, or DDR Control device?) > >> > + */ > >> > + for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++) > >> > + asm volatile ("nop"); } > >> > + > >> > +static void ethernet_init(struct udevice *dev) { > >> > + u32 v; > >> > + struct clk clock; > >> > + struct __prci_data *pd = dev_get_priv(dev); > >> > + > >> > + /* GEMGXL init */ > >> > + clock.id = PRCI_CLK_GEMGXLPLL; > >> > + sifive_fu540_prci_set_rate(&clock, 125UL * MHz); > >> > + > >> > + sifive_fu540_prci_clock_enable(&__prci_init_clocks[clock.id], 1); > >> > + > >> > + /* Release GEMGXL reset */ > >> > + v = __prci_readl(pd, PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_OFFSET); > >> > + v |= PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_GEMGXL_RST_N_MASK; > >> > + __prci_writel(v, PRCI_DEVICESRESETREG_OFFSET, pd); > >> > + > >> > + /* Procmon => core clock */ > >> > + __prci_writel(PRCI_PROCMONCFG_CORE_CLOCK_MASK, > >PRCI_PROCMONCFG_OFFSET, > >> > + pd); > >> > +} > >> > +#endif > >> > + > >> > static int sifive_fu540_prci_probe(struct udevice *dev) { > >> > int i, err; > >> > @@ -679,6 +791,12 @@ static int sifive_fu540_prci_probe(struct udevice > >*dev) > >> > __prci_wrpll_read_cfg0(pd, pc->pwd); > >> > } > >> > > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > >> > + corepll_init(dev); > >> > + ddr_init(dev); > >> > + ethernet_init(dev); > >> > +#endif > >> > >> 1. Why would ethernet clocks require for SPL 2. Why these clocks are > >> special for SPL, can't we use it for U-Boot proper 3. This look like > >> raw clock initialization instead of having in conventional dm way. > >> since these are here just to use pd. May be reuse the required clock > >> of what u-boot proper using or move them into spl code. > > 1. ethernet clock is not necessary for SPL but SPL performs ethernet PHY reset > sequence (board/sifive/fu540/spl.c - "gem_phy_reset") and for that ethernet > clock needs to be enabled.
Can we delay that for U-Boot proper to enable PRCI ethernet clock and reset the PHY ? > > 2. There is nothing special of this clocks for SPL, we can use this for > U-Boot. > I am planning to add this clocks in device tree but I am not sure how to add > coreclk (corepll) in device tree > Do you guys have any suggestion for this ? > Does the example in http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ help? + cpu0: cpu@0 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "kendryte,k210", "sifive,rocket0", "riscv"; + reg = <0>; + riscv,isa = "rv64imafdgc"; + mmu-type = "sv39"; + i-cache-block-size = <64>; + i-cache-size = <0x8000>; + d-cache-block-size = <64>; + d-cache-size = <0x8000>; + clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_CPU>; You need this patch to get clock in the CPU node. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > 3. I am planning to make dm way. > > Any suggestions are welcome > > > > >I believe Jagan's comments are the same as mine that was mentioned in > >previous version: > > > >See > >https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200311070320.21323- > >[email protected]/ > > Regards, Bin
