On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi Dario,
> 
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:27:23 +0200 (CEST)
> Dario [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On 2017/02/07 commit af2cbfd6b982f7a52414ea50b2ece0290d4b748f broke gigabit 
> > ethernet for Olimex A20-OLinuXino-LIME2. This commit likely prevents the 
> > activation of the option CONFIG_RTL8211X_PHY_FORCE_MASTER needed for proper 
> > gigabit networking on this device. Since the only modification introduced 
> > by this commit was moving Kconfig files, I suspect this change may affect 
> > many more devices as well for which proper build options may not be enabled.

Thanks for the regression report.  We do appreciate these whenever they
come in.

> > Apart from how this went unnoticed for such a long time, what really 
> > puzzles me is commit 8728c97eff5bd95f58320f886ae305f17931a374 submitted on 
> > 2017/03/13 which removes CONFIG_RTL8211X_PHY_FORCE_MASTER from 
> > configs/A20-OLinuXino-Lime2_defconfig altogether.
> 
> since the first mentioned commit CONFIG_RTL8211X_PHY_FORCE_MASTER depends
> on CONFIG_PHY_REALTEK, but this was not enabled in board defconfig. This
> is probably the reason why it was dropped in 8728c97eff5b.

Right, it got removed because it couldn't be selected anymore.  This
means that the first commit didn't move everything right.

> > I think it is not by chance that Arch Linux ARM kept the package 
> > uboot-a20-olinuxino-lime2 at version 2017.01-2 which is the last working 
> > version before the aforementioned commit broke gigabit ethernet for this 
> > board.
> > 
> > My A20-OLinuXino-Lime2 is the only device I have available for testing. My 
> > fear is that many more devices may be affected since this same option was 
> > removed from A20-Olimex-SOM-EVB_defconfig as well along with several other 
> > options from many other devices.
> 
> Please test patch [1]. If it helps, we can see how to fix other boards.
> When reporting, please also Cc board maintainers (see 
> board/sunxi/MAINTAINERS).
> Thanks!
> 
> [1] 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/

Please let us know if that works but I'm going to take a look at what
else might be broken by the first commit and the patch above implies we
need to migrate that symbol in a few more cases.

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to