Hi Pragnesh, On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:52 PM Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: > > Hi Bin, > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > >Sent: 20 May 2020 15:54 > >To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >Cc: Rick Chen <rickche...@gmail.com>; Jagan Teki > ><ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com>; U- > >Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; rick <r...@andestech.com>; Alan > >Kao <alan...@andestech.com> > >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL > > > >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize the > >sender and know the content is safe > > > >Hi Pragnesh, > > > >On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:41 PM Pragnesh Patel > ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Bin, > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > >> >Sent: 20 May 2020 13:07 > >> >To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >> >Cc: Rick Chen <rickche...@gmail.com>; Jagan Teki > >> ><ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com>; > >U- > >> >Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; rick <r...@andestech.com>; > >> >Alan Kao <alan...@andestech.com> > >> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL > >> > > >> >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you > >> >recognize the sender and know the content is safe > >> > > >> >"Hi Pragnesh, > >> > > >> >On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:29 PM Pragnesh Patel > >> ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >> >From: Rick Chen <rickche...@gmail.com> > >> >> >Sent: 20 May 2020 08:38 > >> >> >To: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>; Pragnesh Patel > >> >> ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com>; Jagan Teki > >> >> ><ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson > ><sean...@gmail.com> > >> >> >Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; rick > >> >> ><r...@andestech.com>; Alan Kao <alan...@andestech.com> > >> >> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL > >> >> > > >> >> >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you > >> >> >recognize the sender and know the content is safe > >> >> > > >> >> >Hi Bin > >> >> > > >> >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> >> From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng...@gmail.com] > >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:44 PM > >> >> >> To: Pragnesh Patel; Rick Jian-Zhi Chen(陳建志) > >> >> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Rick, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:04 PM Pragnesh Patel > >> >> ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > This series add support for SPL to FU540. U-Boot SPL can boot > >> >> >> > from > >> >> >> > L2 LIM (0x0800_0000) and jump to OpenSBI(FW_DYNAMIC > >firmware) > >> >and > >> >> >> > U-Boot proper from MMC devices. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > This series depends on: > >> >> >> > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281853 > >> >> >> > [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281852 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > All these together is available for testing here [3] [3] > >> >> >> > https://github.com/pragnesh26992/u-boot/tree/spl > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > How to test this patch: > >> >> >> > 1) Go to OpenSBI-dir : make PLATFORM=generic FW_DYNAMIC=y > >> >> >> > 2) export > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> > >>>OPENSBI=<path/to/opensbi/build/platform/generic/firmware/fw_dynami > >c. > >> >> >> > bi > >> >> >> > n> > >> >> >> > 3) Change to u-boot-dir > >> >> >> > 4) make sifive_fu540_defconfig > >> >> >> > 5) make all > >> >> >> > 6) Format the SD card (make sure the disk has GPT, otherwise > >> >> >> > use gdisk to switch) > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > # sudo sgdisk --clear \ > >> >> >> > > --set-alignment=2 \ > >> >> >> > > --new=1:34:2081 --change-name=1:loader1 > >> >> >> > --typecode=1:5B193300- > >> >> >FC78-40CD-8002-E86C45580B47 \ > >> >> >> > > --new=2:2082:10273 --change-name=2:loader2 -- > >> >> >typecode=2:2E54B353-1271-4842-806F-E436D6AF6985 \ > >> >> >> > > --new=3:10274: --change-name=3:rootfs > >> >> >> > --typecode=3:0FC63DAF- > >> >> >8483-4772-8E79-3D69D8477DE4 \ > >> >> >> > > /dev/sda > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > 7) sudo dd if=spl/u-boot-spl.bin of=/dev/sda seek=34 > >> >> >> > 8) sudo dd if=u-boot.itb of=/dev/sda seek=2082 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Changes in v11: > >> >> >> > - Remove TPL related code and OF_PLATDATA from FU540 > >> >> >> > DDR driver (drivers/ram/sifive/fu540_ddr.c) > >> >> >> > - Update FU540 doc (doc/board/sifive/fu540.rst) > >> >> >> > Remove unnecessary print > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Could we get this v11 applied as soon as possible for v2020.07? > >> >> > > >> >> >No problem, if everything is OK, I will applied ASAP. > >> >> >But Jagan seem have some responses, please check about it. > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > This series depends on: > >> >> >> > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281853 > >> >> >> > [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281852 > >> >> > >> >> With " assigned-clocks" and " assigned-clock-rates" for cpus, this > >> >> FU540 SPL series is no more depend on the above patches. > >> >> > >> >> cpus { > >> >> assigned-clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_COREPLL>; > >> >> assigned-clock-rates = <1000000000>; ..... > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> I will update the series dependency in v12. Thanks to @Sean > >> >> Anderson for > >> >the suggestion. > >> >> > >> > > >> >Are these "assigned-clocks" and "assigned-clock-rates" bindings the > >> >suggested ones by the Linux kernel upstream? > >> > >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200502100628.24809- > >> 17-pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com/ > > > >I see. "assigned-clocks" is only needed for U-Boot. > > > >Do we still need "clocks" in each cpu node? > > Right now, "cpu detail" shows wrong frequency in U-Boot for FU540. > This > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200503024637.327733-18-sean...@gmail.com/ > patch solves that problem. > > For this patch, we need "clocks" in each cpu node.
Thanks. So for SPL booting this series does not depend on Sean's patches, but for "cpu detail" to show correct frequency, Sean's patches are still needed. Regards, Bin
