Hi Marek, On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 09:43, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5/25/20 5:36 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 04:35, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On 5/25/20 10:44 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > >>> SPL has a foot-print constraint, so fully switching a particular > >>> subsystem like SPI or SPI Flash to DM would increase the size of it. > >>> > >>> Possible areas to look at are (assume SPL_DM supported) > >>> 1) platdata > >>> 2) implement board or platform specific spl device driver which > >>> bypassed the actual framework ex: spl_spi_sunxi.c > >>> > >>> Do we have any other solutions? or any arguments on above step 2? > >> > >> SPL does not need to support DM until the size problem is solved. > > > > I don't think the problem will ever be 'solved'. It is an ongoing battle. > > > > But as it happens I've just sent a proposal for tiny-dm that I think will > > help. > > > > Jagan, which board are you trying to convert? If you are trying to > > convert SPI flash, I think we need to remove the legacy code first. > > If you want a board which boots from SPI NOR and has some 14k or so > limit on SPL, any of the R-Car Gen2 boards fit the bill.
Thanks...do you have a link to one? Also was there a 64-bit board that had to run 64-bit SPL? I think I remember you mentioning it. Regards, Simon
