On 6/2/20 5:51 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:43:00AM +0000, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >> Booting pine64-lts_defconfig with either of CONFIG_RSA=y or CONFIG_LOG=y >> fails if CONFIG_INIT_SP_RELATIVE is not set. >> >> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> >> --- >> configs/pine64-lts_defconfig | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/configs/pine64-lts_defconfig b/configs/pine64-lts_defconfig >> index ef108a1a31..b03bef01b1 100644 >> --- a/configs/pine64-lts_defconfig >> +++ b/configs/pine64-lts_defconfig >> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ >> CONFIG_ARM=y >> +CONFIG_INIT_SP_RELATIVE=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y >> +CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x8000 >> +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x400 >> CONFIG_SPL=y >> CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I=y >> CONFIG_SUNXI_DRAM_LPDDR3_STOCK=y > > Look at the option however. This is something that all sunxi should be > selecting.
What indicates that all sunxi should select CONFIG_INIT_SP_RELATIVE? > And if this is intentional as part of the design, an audit > of the other ARM64 SoCs would be in order to see who else didn't know > they needed to select this. Thanks! >