On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:09:23AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > > > On 13. 07. 20 22:36, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:25:42PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> At present U-Boot uses the mailing list for patch review. What do > >> people think about trying out geritt or github for this? I'd be > >> willing to do a trial with the -dm mailing list. > >> > >> My idea is that patman would email out the patches and also upload > >> them to one of these systems. With geritt, emails are sent every time > >> there is a review, but for github I'm not sure. > > > > As you said, you also intended to include gitlab in the list. > > > > So, things that I think could be better, or more widely known, would be > > how to trigger Azure CI runs (as there's good resources available for > > free) and GitLab for non-custodians. By which I mean, anyone can get a > > CI run on Azure today via a GitHub PR. Making that known more widely > > would be good. > > > > For patch review, are there any of the Linux kernel bots that are well > > enough documented for someone else to pick up and use? I feel like our > > biggest problems are: > > - Lack of reviewers in general for various areas. > > - Lack of feedback to users (developers) before being picked up for > > general changes. > > > > For the second problem, I feel like some of the Linux bots would be a > > little helpful, but probably require some tweaking (figure out when / > > how to fire off more limited CI, or just do a daily CI run vs every > > patch, given the size of our CI build). > > > > Don't have details but patchwork should support (somehow) to run some > checks. > Here you can see it working. > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/1594676120-5862-7-git-send-email-prabhakar.mahadev-lad...@bp.renesas.com/ > or > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20200713132927.24925-2-abai...@baylibre.com/ > > It means when the patch reach patchwork checks can run. Would be > wonderful to get PASS/FAIL with link via email from CI loop. > > I don't have experience with gerrit but definitely don't like using > github for contribution and prefer to use review based on emails.
Oh wow, that is useful. Rob, can you share what you're doing for that? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature