On 18.09.20 18:21, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:56:03PM +0200, Soeren Moch wrote: >> >> On 18.09.20 17:51, Stefano Babic wrote: >>> On 18.09.20 17:48, Soeren Moch wrote: >>>> On 18.09.20 17:21, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> This is not required for sysboot (we defined fdtfile), let's save a few >>>>>> bytes in the binary image without these variables. >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch <[email protected]> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> >>>>> Applied to u-boot-imx, master, thanks ! >>>>> >>>> Thanks, Stefano. >>>> >>>> What happened to the first patch of this series? Patchwork status is >>>> "Changes Requested", but his patch only received 2 reviewed-by, no other >>>> requests. >>> Mmmhhh...when patch is in "Changes requested", it disappears from >>> Patchwork's TODO list and I do not see it anymore. Thanks for reporting >>> this, I search for it and I'll pick it up. >>> >> OK, thanks. No problem to apply patch 1/2 after 2/2. > Sorry, I think I see what happened. I had intended to, I suspect, mark > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > as "Changes Requested" (in part because it was suggested to also change > the level of the message, and in part because I think it's been > superseded by a change to do the same thing basically by now) and my > mouse slipped. > > I'll re-confirm that the MAC warning thing has been taken care of today, > as well. Again, sorry about that! > The MAC warning on tbs2910 was gone some time ago. So the linked patch must indeed be superseded by something that is already applied.
Soeren
