On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 3:35 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries <[email protected]> wrote:
> um, weird....the patch indicates imx6 in the name. this should be enough no? imx6 is too generic. Which imx6? imx6sx, imx6sl, imx6solo, imx6dl, imx6qp, imx6q, imx6ul, imx6ull, imx6ulz? It is OK to keep mx6 in the Subject though. > so you need the names and versions of the errata document for each SoC being > affected? > that being the case, should it be a patch per family or a patch per SoC? No, my point was just to replace: [1] Rev 2, 10/2019, ERR007805 (this is not a doc reference) by a real errata document reference. It can be imx6ull, imx6sl or any other SoC errata document like, for example: IMX6SLCE Rev. 5, 02/2019
