This exercises a few success and failure modes of the log filter-*
commands. log filter-list is not tested because it's purely informational.
I don't think there's a good way to test it except by testing if the output
of the command exactly matches a sample run.

Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
---

Changes in v4:
- Wrap UCLASS_ literals with log_uc_cat when used as log categories

Changes in v3:
- Update copyright for log_filter.c

Changes in v2:
- Converted log filter-* tests to C from python

 include/test/log.h    |   1 +
 test/log/Makefile     |   1 +
 test/log/log_filter.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test/log/log_filter.c

diff --git a/include/test/log.h b/include/test/log.h
index 772e197806..e902891450 100644
--- a/include/test/log.h
+++ b/include/test/log.h
@@ -14,5 +14,6 @@
 
 /* Declare a new logging test */
 #define LOG_TEST(_name) UNIT_TEST(_name, 0, log_test)
+#define LOG_TEST_FLAGS(_name, _flags) UNIT_TEST(_name, _flags, log_test)
 
 #endif /* __TEST_LOG_H__ */
diff --git a/test/log/Makefile b/test/log/Makefile
index 52e2f7b41c..9a6cdbe643 100644
--- a/test/log/Makefile
+++ b/test/log/Makefile
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 # Copyright (c) 2017 Google, Inc
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_LOG_TEST) += log_test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_LOG) += log_filter.o
 
 ifdef CONFIG_UT_LOG
 
diff --git a/test/log/log_filter.c b/test/log/log_filter.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e8a6e01a5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/log/log_filter.c
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com>
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <console.h>
+#include <log.h>
+#include <test/log.h>
+#include <test/ut.h>
+
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
+
+/* Test invalid options */
+static int log_test_filter_invalid(struct unit_test_state *uts)
+{
+       ut_asserteq(1, run_command("log filter-add -AD", 0));
+       ut_asserteq(1, run_command("log filter-add -l1 -L1", 0));
+       ut_asserteq(1, run_command("log filter-add -l1 -L1", 0));
+       ut_asserteq(1, run_command("log filter-add -lfoo", 0));
+       ut_asserteq(1, run_command("log filter-add -cfoo", 0));
+       ut_asserteq(1, run_command("log filter-add -ccore -ccore -ccore -ccore "
+                                  "-ccore -ccore", 0));
+
+       return 0;
+}
+LOG_TEST_FLAGS(log_test_filter_invalid, UT_TESTF_CONSOLE_REC);
+
+/* Test adding and removing filters */
+static int log_test_filter(struct unit_test_state *uts)
+{
+       bool any_found = false;
+       bool filt1_found = false;
+       bool filt2_found = false;
+       char cmd[32];
+       struct log_filter *filt;
+       struct log_device *ldev;
+       ulong filt1, filt2;
+
+#define create_filter(args, filter_num) do {\
+       ut_assertok(console_record_reset_enable()); \
+       ut_assertok(run_command("log filter-add -p " args, 0)); \
+       ut_assert_skipline(); \
+       ut_assertok(strict_strtoul(uts->actual_str, 10, &(filter_num))); \
+       ut_assert_console_end(); \
+} while (0)
+
+       create_filter("", filt1);
+       create_filter("-DL warning -cmmc -cspi -ffile", filt2);
+
+       ldev = log_device_find_by_name("console");
+       ut_assertnonnull(ldev);
+       list_for_each_entry(filt, &ldev->filter_head, sibling_node) {
+               if (filt->filter_num == filt1) {
+                       filt1_found = true;
+                       ut_asserteq(0, filt->flags);
+                       ut_asserteq(LOGL_MAX, filt->level);
+                       ut_assertnull(filt->file_list);
+               } else if (filt->filter_num == filt2) {
+                       filt2_found = true;
+                       ut_asserteq(LOGFF_HAS_CAT | LOGFF_DENY |
+                                   LOGFF_LEVEL_MIN, filt->flags);
+                       ut_asserteq(true, log_has_cat(filt->cat_list,
+                                                     log_uc_cat(UCLASS_MMC)));
+                       ut_asserteq(true, log_has_cat(filt->cat_list,
+                                                     log_uc_cat(UCLASS_SPI)));
+                       ut_asserteq(LOGL_WARNING, filt->level);
+                       ut_asserteq_str("file", filt->file_list);
+               }
+       }
+       ut_asserteq(true, filt1_found);
+       ut_asserteq(true, filt2_found);
+
+#define remove_filter(filter_num) do { \
+       ut_assertok(console_record_reset_enable()); \
+       snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "log filter-remove %lu", filter_num); \
+       ut_assertok(run_command(cmd, 0)); \
+       ut_assert_console_end(); \
+} while (0)
+
+       remove_filter(filt1);
+       remove_filter(filt2);
+
+       filt1_found = false;
+       filt2_found = false;
+       list_for_each_entry(filt, &ldev->filter_head, sibling_node) {
+               if (filt->filter_num == filt1)
+                       filt1_found = true;
+               else if (filt->filter_num == filt2)
+                       filt2_found = true;
+       }
+       ut_asserteq(false, filt1_found);
+       ut_asserteq(false, filt2_found);
+
+       create_filter("", filt1);
+       create_filter("", filt2);
+
+       ut_assertok(console_record_reset_enable());
+       ut_assertok(run_command("log filter-remove -a", 0));
+       ut_assert_console_end();
+
+       list_for_each_entry(filt, &ldev->filter_head, sibling_node)
+               any_found = true;
+       ut_asserteq(false, any_found);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+LOG_TEST_FLAGS(log_test_filter, UT_TESTF_CONSOLE_REC);
-- 
2.28.0

Reply via email to