Use the new sequence number in all cases. Since all devices are assigned
a number when bound, this hack should not be needed.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/usb/host/ehci-vf.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-vf.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-vf.c
index 92b70ba1b30..dd82669b284 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-vf.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-vf.c
@@ -296,16 +296,14 @@ static const struct ehci_ops vf_ehci_ops = {
 
 static int vf_usb_bind(struct udevice *dev)
 {
-       static int num_controllers;
-
        /*
         * Without this hack, if we return ENODEV for USB Controller 0, on
         * probe for the next controller, USB Controller 1 will be given a
         * sequence number of 0. This conflicts with our requirement of
         * sequence numbers while initialising the peripherals.
+        *
+        * FIXME: Check that this still works OK with the new sequence numbers
         */
-       dev->req_seq = num_controllers;
-       num_controllers++;
 
        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog

Reply via email to