Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > > Humble proposal: admit an options field of the form > > boardname[:[cfgopt1[,cfgopt2...]][:<opt1>[,<opt2>]] > > I.e., have two sets of definitions, cfgopts and opts, separated by > colons; each cfgopt or opt is of the form SYM or SYM=VAL. The cfgopt set > gets the CONFIG_ prefix, the opt set does not.
Ah! Good idea. I like that. Let me sleep on that, but I guess that's what I'll do. Thanks a lot! Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. - Mark Twain _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
