On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 03:03:11PM +0100, Marek Behun wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:39:09 -0500 > Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, past migration deadline doesn't mean it can cause CI to fail. I'm > > just now throwing things out that are 2 years past the deadline, and > > we'll probably be doing that for a few releases. > > Tom, I would like to send v4 without the CONFIG_DM #ifdefs. > > tqma6s_wru4_mmc_defconfig is the only defconfig that defines CONFIG_DM=n > > Since I do not have this board, I cannot work on converting it to DM. > > I can either > - add patch removing this board from U-Boot to this patch series > - send patch removing this board as separate from this series and send > this series only after the board is removed > - stick if #ifdefs > - try to use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DM), but this would need some extra > patches into header files because of undefined references (we really > don't want this) > - something different > > How should I proceed?
You can say your series depends on: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ which drops tqma6s_wru4_mmc_defconfig and you should submit a PR against https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/ which will trigger a CI run in Azure so you can see what else fails to build, or if that really is the only board that would fail to build, in this case. Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
