On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:13:45AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Masami, > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 20:03, Masami Hiramatsu > <masami.hirama...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > 2021年4月30日(金) 1:10 Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>: > > > > > > Hi Masami, > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 16:38, Masami Hiramatsu > > > <masami.hirama...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Many architecture do not have specific asm/arch/gpio.h, so instead > > > > of adding !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_xxx), introduce CONFIG_ONLY_GENERIC_GPIO > > > > > > This seems OK, but I think GPIO_GENERIC_ONLY is a better name, since > > > it uses the GPIO prefix. > > > > > > I would also prefer to have a 'positive' option, but I suspect that > > > might be a pain to do? > > > > Would you mean making it something like CONFIG_GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER ? > > > > I think it is also possible. My concern is if I missed any arch which > > should say y that :P. > > Yes...it's just that negative configs generally cause us pain at some point.
And in terms of catching all of the platforms, you can submit a pull request in GitHub which will trigger a CI world build and tell you what's broken :) -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
