On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:52:39PM +0800, Green Wan wrote: Hi Green,
> Hi Leo and Bin, > > I have the 'binman' patch for unmatched ready. So, we can pick up the > 'binman' series first. > > I plan to create a v10 patchset that includes the fu740 series on top of > 'binman' patch and 'split CLINT' patchset and appends 'clear feature disable > CSRs' and 'binman change for unmatched'. But I keep the pcie_dw_common.c > compilation fixes in the separated > patch. (already posted) > > What do you think of it? If there is no further revisement needed, I can > do the patch. > > Many thanks, > - Green > Hi Green, Unfortunately, the patch for compilation fixes still does not work. CI result: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv/-/pipelines/7580 But other than that, sounds good to me. Thanks! Best regards, Leo > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:35 PM Green Wan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Leo, > > I just posted the patch for pcie_dw_common.c compilation error. Please check > and see if it works. Thanks. > > Hi Bin and Leo, > > And I'll check the 'binman' patch series soon. See if we can have both binman > and fu740 patchset ready. > > Regards, > Green > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:12 PM Green Wan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As I mentioned before, pcie_dw_common.c is not part of fu740 patch. The error > is actually nothing to do with fu740 patchset. Even I fix those warning > message. It will not be in same patch series. > > > - Green > > > Leo Liang <[email protected]>於 2021年5月18日 週二，下午8:00寫道： > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:56:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > > Hi Green, > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Green, > > >> > > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote: > > >> > > Hi Bin, > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log. My > > >> > > original > > >> > > patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since fu740 > > >> > > series > > >> > > wasn't present yet. > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi Rick, > > >> > > > > >> > > Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts need > > >> > > more > > >> > > revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and > > >> > > "disable CSR" > > >> > > patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9 > > >> > > patch and > > >> > > include these 2 patches. > > >> > > > > >> > > Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can > > >> > > wait for > > >> > > fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for > > >> > > this revert > > >> > > and CSR disable. > > >> > > > > >> > > What do you think? Many thanks. > > >> > > > > >> > > Regards, > > >> > > - Green > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Green, > > >> > > > >> > Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 > > >> > unmatched patch > > >> > and send a v9 patch ? Thanks! > > >> > > > >> > > >> I think you will need some update per this patch as well: > > >> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > > > > > > > > > Hi Bin > > > I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks, > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Hi Leo, > > >> > > >> What's your plan for the binman patch series? > > >> > > >> If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched > > >> to use binman as well. > > > > > > > > > Hi Leo/Bin, > > > > > > Are we referring to > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html? > > > > This one: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992 > > > > > I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes. Thanks, > > > > Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my > > patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert > > unmatched. > > > > But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another > > version to do the convert in the first place. > > > > Leo, please let us know your plan. > > > > Hi Bin/Green, > > I was thinking picking Bin's patch first, > because Green's patch could not pass CI. > (Due to some format warning being treated as error > when compiling drivers/pci/pcie_dw_common.c) > > At the meantime, we should come up with some fixes to pass CI. > Then Green could send his patch with binman, > or a seperate patch to track binman utility. > > What do you guys think? > > Best regards, > Leo > > > > Regards, > > Bin >
