From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> dev_read_addr_size() is inconsistent in too many ways. In particular, it does not retrieve the correct address/size cell number from the DT. dev_read_addr_size_index() does the right thing, so use that for now.
This fixes reading the address size e.g. on boards with the 64-bit AM65x where some pinctrl nodes only use 32-bit addresses and sizes. Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index ebb7602dde..2769b7a7fd 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int single_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev) return -EINVAL; } - addr = dev_read_addr_size(dev, "reg", &size); + addr = dev_read_addr_size_index(dev, 0, &size); if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) { dev_err(dev, "failed to get base register size\n"); return -EINVAL; -- 2.26.2
