On 10.08.21 13:30, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
On 10/08/2021 09.13, Stefan Roese wrote:
+/* This implementation handles overlaps and supports both memcpy and memmove
+ from a single entry point. It uses unaligned accesses and branchless
Any reason not to take advantage of that, i.e. provide memmove as an
alias for memcpy and thus get a fast(er) memmove for free? It would even
reduce .text a little by not needing to include the lib/ provided
memmove implementation.
Makes absolute sense, thanks. I'll change v3 accordingly.
Thanks,
Stefan
