Hi Reinhart, Le 31/10/2010 09:40, Reinhard Meyer a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > >> CS toolchain emits lots of >> warnings about type-punned pointer dereferencing, though none in nand >> code, and I think these are not related to our issue. > > Same with gcc 4.3.5 > >> I will now analyze the patch code to see if it contains relocations that >> should have applied but did not, or if it misses relocations altogether. >> My currently favored bet right now is that BSS may have gotten its own >> relocation table in later toolchains, but that's only a bet. > > u-boot.bin is 257KiB with 4.2.4 but only 251KiB with 4.3.5 ! > Either its much better optimised or the relocation info shrunk which > _might_ indicate something is missing in it...
From what I see, the code generator emits "denser" code, which *could* result in a smaller relocation table, but that depends if the denser code does uses less literals (they're what makes the size of relocation tables). So I have to dive into some sample functions and see for myself; the fact that the linker obviously reorders code within .text does not help me much. :/ > Compiled with 4.3.5 last output is the "DRAM: 64 MiB" message. Then silence. > > I suppose you don't need u-boot.elf from me, if otherwise, ping me:) I'm ok now that I have a non-working toolchain to play with. :) > Best Regards, > Reinhard Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
