Hi Wolfgang,

On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 08:58, Wolfgang Denk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Simon,
>
> In message 
> <capnjgz0avwo2mq9bnw-9xz+xpzvm6negf9sqxntar9ghttx...@mail.gmail.com> you 
> wrote:
> >
> > - programming errors
> > - security errors where user input is insufficiently checked
> >
> > IMO the former should not be present if you have sufficient tests and
> > trying to catch them in the field at runtime is not very kind to your
> > users.
>
> Wow.
>
> I think I'll add this to my signature database:
>
> | "Trying to catch [programming errors] in the field at runtime is not
> | very kind to your users."
> |
> | - Simon Glass in 
> <capnjgz0avwo2mq9bnw-9xz+xpzvm6negf9sqxntar9ghttx...@mail.gmail.com>

Well you've taken it out of context :-) It would make more sense if
you mention the need for tests

Regards,
Simon

Reply via email to