Wood Scott-B07421 <b07...@freescale.com> wrote on 2010/11/04 17:47:41: > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Trial and error suggests that map_flash_by_law1 needs > > an isync(padding with 4 nop's also did the trick) > > after updating LBLAWAR1 to make sure the the change has > > reached the HW before continuing with the code that depends on it. > > Add an isync to remap_flash_by_law0 for good measure too. > > To be totally safe, we probably want to do a readback plus twi (to turn a > data dependency into a flow dependency) before the isync.
Feel free but there is no data cache here and IMMR should be GUARDED, still need that anyway? Jocke _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
