On Thursday 30 September 2021 13:46:31 Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:08:58PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Pali, > > > > On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 15:30, Pali Rohár <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 20 July 2021 12:32:46 Simon Glass wrote: > > > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 05:10, Pali Rohár <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > OEM_REVISION is 32-bit unsigned number. It should be increased only > > > > > when > > > > > changing software version. Therefore it should not depend on build > > > > > time. > > > > > > > > > > Change calculation to use U-Boot version numbers and set this revision > > > > > to date number. > > > > > > > > > > Prior this change OEM_REVISION was calculated from build date and > > > > > stored in > > > > > the same format. > > > > > > > > > > After this change macro U_BOOT_BUILD_DATE is not used in other files > > > > > so > > > > > remove it from global autogenerated files and also from Makefile. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <[email protected]> > > > > > --- > > > > > This patch depends on similar patch for BIOS Release Date which is > > > > > here: > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > > > > > --- > > > > > Makefile | 2 -- > > > > > doc/develop/version.rst | 1 - > > > > > lib/acpi/acpi_table.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > > test/dm/acpi.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > > > > > 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > > > > > > Hello! Could you process this patch? Or are there any issues? > > > > +Tom Rini > > > > It isn't in my queue. Perhaps Tom has it? > > Well, hunh. I don't know when I moved it to Accepted, but it clearly > wasn't. Sorry about that.
Ok, so could be this patch accepted?
