Hi Heinrich, On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 11:35, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 9/25/21 2:30 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > It is quite complicating to run U-Boot on qemu since we have four > > Nits: > %s/complicating/complicated/ %/qemu/QEMU/ > > > different builds and they must use different versions of qemu and the > > QEMU > > > UEFI binaries. > > > > Add a script to help. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Add MAINTAINERS entry > > - Add support for creating a partition table with a filesystem inside > > - Add support for running qemu with just a serial console (no display) > > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > doc/develop/uefi/u-boot_on_efi.rst | 62 ++++++++++ > > scripts/build-efi.sh | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 251 insertions(+) > > create mode 100755 scripts/build-efi.sh
[..] > > diff --git a/scripts/build-efi.sh b/scripts/build-efi.sh > > new file mode 100755 > > index 00000000000..e6c035a7495 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/scripts/build-efi.sh > > @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ > > +#!/bin/bash > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > +# > > +# Script to build an EFI thing suitable for booting with qemu, possibly > > running > > +# it also. > > + > > +# This just an example. It assumes that > > + > > +# - you build U-Boot in /tmp/b/<name> where <name> is the U-Boot board > > config > > +# - /mnt/x is a directory used for mounting > > +# - you have access to the 'pure UEFI' builds for qemu > > +# > > +# UEFI binaries for QEMU used for testing this script: > > +# > > +# OVMF-pure-efi.i386.fd at > > +# > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jWzOAZfQqMmS2_dAK2G518GhIgj9r2RY/view?usp=sharing > > + > > +# OVMF-pure-efi.x64.fd at > > +# > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1c39YI9QtpByGQ4V0UNNQtGqttEzS-eFV/view?usp=sharing > > + > > +set -e > > + > > +usage() { > > + echo "Usage: $0 [-a | -p] [other opts]" 1>&2 > > + echo 1>&2 > > + echo " -a - Package up the app" 1>&2 > > + echo " -o - Use old EFI app build (before 32/64 split)" 1>&2 > > Why is this option needed? I think it is wise for now, in case we hit regressions. This allows comparing the 'old' build with the new one. I have used it quite a few times. We can drop this option once everything is settled. [..] Regards, Simon
