Hi Michael On Sat, 2021-10-23 at 01:28 +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > Am 2021-10-23 01:09, schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: > > Sorry, I did not want to upset anybody. I probably should have asked > > first before doing this. > > You could have said the below in the cover letter. Then > I'd have at least an idea what is going on ;) > > > On Sat, 2021-10-23 at 00:52 +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > > Hi Marcel, > > > > > > Am 2021-10-23 00:19, schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: > > > > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswi...@toradex.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that this re-base is only compile tested. > > > > > > Care to explain what this is? Why are you taking my patchset > > > and make a new version of it and rebasing it on the wrong > > > tree? > > > > You might have noticed that Stefano has a hard time applying some > > patch sets due to continuing conflicts. > > Therefore in trying to further the binman clean-up [1] were I am just > > about to post a new version as well, I > > took the liberty to re-fresh all the patches my series bases on which > > have not seen any care for more than a > > month. I re-based them on top of Stefano's u-boot-imx/master branch > > which I am very certain is exactly the tree > > stuff needs to be re-based to, not? > > This is a layerscape SoC board whose patches usually go through > u-boot-fsl-qoriq. Apart from the one doc fix there should be no > dependency on the u-boot-imx tree. I just took Frieder's doc fix > because my last patch depends on it, (in a sense that it doesn't > apply without it). The imx tree should be fine without the fix, > it's just that the generated doc is messed up for the kontron > boards.
Hm, now as you say it I am also wondering a little bit why it slipped into my dependency list. And then, of course, nobody noticed anything (;-p). > I think you don't really need this for your series. > > > > Did I miss something? > > > > Not sure. If you still feel my work is of no help to the community I > > am more than happy to abandon any of it. > > Now knowing why you did it, it's fine; its just the wrong > tree. Yep, now I see it. And my re-base does not even make any sense in this case. I guess, your v3 was and is still just fine for the u-boot-fsl-qoriq/master branch. Let me just cancel this v4 then. I am really sorry and hope I did not disturb anything. > -michael Cheers Marcel