>On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:22:10PM +0530, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:29 AM Priyanka Jain (OSS) >> <[email protected]> wrote:
.. >> > Tom, >> > >> > I agree that bindings patch is essential for device-tree changes. >> > But merging this patch will break Layerscape Platforms. >> > We have requested Rayagonda to submit Binding patch to upstream for review. >> > >> > If first patch of binding gets submitted timely, can we defer this patch. >> > >> > Regards >> > Priyanka >> > >> ++Bharat, Roman and Henrik. > > Yes, please keep me in the loop on this binding being reviewed upstream. > Also, please check the tree for other bindings that haven't been > submitted, but also haven't been noticed yet. There is not supposed to > be anything outside of the -u-boot.dtsi files that can't be replaced by > dropping in a newer set of upstream dts files. And the -u-boot.dtsi > files are for u-boot specific bindings (that we're working on > upstreaming) or actively in-review bindings upstream. Are there any news on this topic? Was there a submission to linux for the binding in the meantime? Unfortunately, I wasn't in the loop here (albeit being the Reported-by: one). Until now, this patch is a prerequisite for my ls1028a device tree sync series [1]. -michael [1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/
