On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:48 PM Marek Behún <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:40:11 +0200 > Robert Marko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > To me, it also doesn't make sense to do it like that as what's the > > purpose of having stuff that is completely unsupported in U-boot in > > DTS? > > It makes sense because the device tree should compeltely describe the > device. It doesn't matter if some of it's components don't have U-Boot > drivers. Devicetree is independent on sw, and should be the same for > Linux, BSD, and U-Boot.
Trust me, I wish this was true, but I don't see it happening anytime soon as bindings will always change but it is something to aspire to. > > > Also, take a look at other Armada 7k/8k devices, they are all doing it > > the same way as I am. > > Some of them (most?) are, but that's just because we haven't synced > them yet. > > But you don't need to do it now, IMO, if it would take too much work. The thing is that you cant just copy/paste the Linux DTS, it won't compile as the SoC DTSI as well as CP DTSI are different. Otherwise having a -u-boot.dtsi would work and I honestly don't have time to sync those and then fix all of the regressions. Regards, Robert > > Marek -- Robert Marko Staff Embedded Linux Engineer Sartura Ltd. Lendavska ulica 16a 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Email: [email protected] Web: www.sartura.hr
