On Monday, November 15, 2010 15:51:14 Kumar Gala wrote: > returns memory ack to sbrk() via malloc_trim we could possible get
"ack" -> "back" > The following code problems an example test to show the issue. i dont understand this sentence > we > could possible get non-zero'd memory from sbrk() if it allocates back > memory that was previously freed to it. > > There are two possible solutions to this problem. > 1. change #define MORECORE_CLEARS 0 > 2. memset to zero memory returned to sbrk. > > We go with the second since the sbrk being called to free up memory > should be pretty rare. > > The following code problems an example test to show the issue. This > test code was inserted right after the call to mem_malloc_init(). this looks like the changelog is partially duplicated -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
