Hi Weijie,

(sorry for the delayed response)

On 12/3/21 5:06 AM, Weijie Gao wrote:
On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:44 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 11/18/21 8:35 PM, Weijie Gao wrote:
This patch adds a clock driver for MediaTek MT7621 SoC.
This driver provides clock gate control as well as getting clock
frequency
for CPU/SYS/XTAL and some peripherals.

Signed-off-by: Weijie Gao <weijie....@mediatek.com>
---
v2 changes: none
---
   drivers/clk/mtmips/Makefile            |   1 +
   drivers/clk/mtmips/clk-mt7621.c        | 260
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
   include/dt-bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h |  42 ++++
   3 files changed, 303 insertions(+)
   create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mtmips/clk-mt7621.c
   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h

diff --git a/drivers/clk/mtmips/Makefile
b/drivers/clk/mtmips/Makefile
index 732e7f2545..ee8b5afe87 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mtmips/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/mtmips/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
   # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_MT7620) += clk-mt7620.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_MT7621) += clk-mt7621.o
   obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_MT7628) += clk-mt7628.o
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mtmips/clk-mt7621.c
b/drivers/clk/mtmips/clk-mt7621.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3799d1806a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/mtmips/clk-mt7621.c
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 MediaTek Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+ *
+ * Author: Weijie Gao <weijie....@mediatek.com>
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <clk-uclass.h>
+#include <dm.h>
+#include <dm/device_compat.h>
+#include <regmap.h>
+#include <syscon.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+
+#define SYSC_MAP_SIZE                  0x100
+#define MEMC_MAP_SIZE                  0x1000
+
+/* SYSC */
+#define SYSCFG0_REG                    0x10
+#define XTAL_MODE_SEL_S                        6
+#define XTAL_MODE_SEL_M                        0x1c0

Please use genmask to define this:

#define XTAL_MODE_SEL_M                 GENMASK(8, 6)

and SEL_S is unnecessary, see commentary below.

+
+#define CLKCFG0_REG                    0x2c
+#define CPU_CLK_SEL_S                  30
+#define CPU_CLK_SEL_M                  0xc0000000
+#define PERI_CLK_SEL                   0x10
+
+#define CLKCFG1_REG                    0x30
+
+#define CUR_CLK_STS_REG                        0x44
+#define CUR_CPU_FDIV_S                 8
+#define CUR_CPU_FDIV_M                 0x1f00
+#define CUR_CPU_FFRAC_S                        0
+#define CUR_CPU_FFRAC_M                        0x1f
+
+/* MEMC */
+#define MEMPLL1_REG                    0x0604
+#define RG_MEPL_DIV2_SEL_S             1
+#define RG_MEPL_DIV2_SEL_M             0x06
+
+#define MEMPLL6_REG                    0x0618
+#define MEMPLL18_REG                   0x0648
+#define RG_MEPL_PREDIV_S               12
+#define RG_MEPL_PREDIV_M               0x3000
+#define RG_MEPL_FBDIV_S                        4
+#define RG_MEPL_FBDIV_M                        0x7f0
+
+/* Clock sources */
+#define CLK_SRC_CPU                    -1
+#define CLK_SRC_CPU_D2                 -2
+#define CLK_SRC_DDR                    -3
+#define CLK_SRC_SYS                    -4
+#define CLK_SRC_XTAL                   -5
+#define CLK_SRC_PERI                   -6

Please use an enum. And why are these negative?

I'll rewrite this


+/* EPLL clock */
+#define EPLL_CLK                       50000000
+
+struct mt7621_clk_priv {
+       void __iomem *sysc_base;
+       void __iomem *memc_base;
+       int cpu_clk;
+       int ddr_clk;
+       int sys_clk;
+       int xtal_clk;
+};
+
+static const int mt7621_clks[] = {
+       [CLK_SYS] = CLK_SRC_SYS,
+       [CLK_DDR] = CLK_SRC_DDR,
+       [CLK_CPU] = CLK_SRC_CPU,
+       [CLK_XTAL] = CLK_SRC_XTAL,
+       [CLK_MIPS_CNT] = CLK_SRC_CPU_D2,
+       [CLK_UART3] = CLK_SRC_PERI,
+       [CLK_UART2] = CLK_SRC_PERI,
+       [CLK_UART1] = CLK_SRC_PERI,
+       [CLK_SPI] = CLK_SRC_SYS,
+       [CLK_I2C] = CLK_SRC_PERI,
+       [CLK_TIMER] = CLK_SRC_PERI,
+};
+
+static ulong mt7621_clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
+{
+       struct mt7621_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
+       u32 val;
+
+       if (clk->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(mt7621_clks))
+               return 0;
+
+       switch (mt7621_clks[clk->id]) {
+       case CLK_SRC_CPU:
+               return priv->cpu_clk;
+       case CLK_SRC_CPU_D2:
+               return priv->cpu_clk / 2;
+       case CLK_SRC_DDR:
+               return priv->ddr_clk;
+       case CLK_SRC_SYS:
+               return priv->sys_clk;
+       case CLK_SRC_XTAL:
+               return priv->xtal_clk;
+       case CLK_SRC_PERI:
+               val = readl(priv->sysc_base + CLKCFG0_REG);
+               if (val & PERI_CLK_SEL)
+                       return priv->xtal_clk;
+               else
+                       return EPLL_CLK;
+       default:
+               return 0;

-ENOSYS

+       }
+}
+
+static int mt7621_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
+{
+       struct mt7621_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
+
+       if (clk->id > 31)

Please compare with a symbol.

OK. actually the clock gate register is 32-bit, and 31 is the MSB.

see below


+               return -1;

-ENOSYS

+
+       setbits_32(priv->sysc_base + CLKCFG1_REG, BIT(clk->id));
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int mt7621_clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
+{
+       struct mt7621_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
+
+       if (clk->id > 31)
+               return -1;
+
+       clrbits_32(priv->sysc_base + CLKCFG1_REG, BIT(clk->id));
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+const struct clk_ops mt7621_clk_ops = {
+       .enable = mt7621_clk_enable,
+       .disable = mt7621_clk_disable,
+       .get_rate = mt7621_clk_get_rate,
+};
+
+static void mt7621_get_clocks(struct mt7621_clk_priv *priv)
+{
+       u32 bs, xtal_sel, clkcfg0, cur_clk, mempll, dividx, fb;
+       u32 xtal_clk, xtal_div, ffiv, ffrac, cpu_clk, ddr_clk;
+       static const u32 xtal_div_tbl[] = {0, 1, 2, 2};
+
+       bs = readl(priv->sysc_base + SYSCFG0_REG);
+       clkcfg0 = readl(priv->sysc_base + CLKCFG0_REG);
+       cur_clk = readl(priv->sysc_base + CUR_CLK_STS_REG);
+
+       xtal_sel = (bs & XTAL_MODE_SEL_M) >> XTAL_MODE_SEL_S;

xtal_sel = FIELD_GET(XTAL_MODE_SEL_M, bs);

got it.


+
+       if (xtal_sel <= 2)
+               xtal_clk = 20 * 1000 * 1000;
+       else if (xtal_sel <= 5)
+               xtal_clk = 40 * 1000 * 1000;
+       else
+               xtal_clk = 25 * 1000 * 1000;
+
+       switch ((clkcfg0 & CPU_CLK_SEL_M) >> CPU_CLK_SEL_S) {

ditto

+       case 0:
+               cpu_clk = 500 * 1000 * 1000;
+               break;
+       case 1:
+               mempll = readl(priv->memc_base + MEMPLL18_REG);
+               dividx = (mempll & RG_MEPL_PREDIV_M) >>
RG_MEPL_PREDIV_S;
+               fb = (mempll & RG_MEPL_FBDIV_M) >>
RG_MEPL_FBDIV_S;

ditto

+               xtal_div = 1 << xtal_div_tbl[dividx];
+               cpu_clk = (fb + 1) * xtal_clk / xtal_div;
+               break;
+       default:
+               cpu_clk = xtal_clk;
+       }
+
+       ffiv = (cur_clk & CUR_CPU_FDIV_M) >> CUR_CPU_FDIV_S;
+       ffrac = (cur_clk & CUR_CPU_FFRAC_M) >> CUR_CPU_FFRAC_S;

ditto

+       cpu_clk = cpu_clk / ffiv * ffrac;
+
+       mempll = readl(priv->memc_base + MEMPLL6_REG);
+       dividx = (mempll & RG_MEPL_PREDIV_M) >> RG_MEPL_PREDIV_S;
+       fb = (mempll & RG_MEPL_FBDIV_M) >> RG_MEPL_FBDIV_S;

ditto

+       xtal_div = 1 << xtal_div_tbl[dividx];
+       ddr_clk = fb * xtal_clk / xtal_div;
+
+       bs = readl(priv->memc_base + MEMPLL1_REG);
+       if (((bs & RG_MEPL_DIV2_SEL_M) >> RG_MEPL_DIV2_SEL_S) ==
0)

ditto

and you can just use

        if (!cond)

+               ddr_clk *= 2;
+
+       priv->cpu_clk = cpu_clk;
+       priv->sys_clk = cpu_clk / 4;
+       priv->ddr_clk = ddr_clk;
+       priv->xtal_clk = xtal_clk;

Please implement the above logic in get_rate(). For example:

static ulong do_mt7621_clk_get_rate()
{
        ...
        switch (clk->id) {
                case CLK_SYS:
                        cpu_clk = do_mt7621_clk_get_rate(priv,
CLK_SYS);
                        return IS_ERROR_VALUE(cpu_clk) ? cpu_clk :
cpu_clk / 4;
                ...
        }
}

static ulong mt7621_clk_get_rate()
{
        struct mt7621_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);

        return do_mt7621_clk_get_rate(priv, clk->id);
}

ok


+}
+
+static int mt7621_clk_probe(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+       struct mt7621_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
+       struct ofnode_phandle_args args;
+       struct regmap *regmap;
+       void __iomem *base;
+       int ret;
+
+       /* get corresponding sysc phandle */
+       ret = dev_read_phandle_with_args(dev, "mediatek,sysc",
NULL, 0, 0,
+                                        &args);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(args.node);

According to the Linux binding for this node, it is supposed to live
under the syscon already. So you can do

        syscon_node_to_regmap(dev_ofnode(dev_get_parent(dev)));

and skip the phandle.

I'll try this


+       if (IS_ERR(regmap))
+               return PTR_ERR(regmap);
+
+       base = regmap_get_range(regmap, 0);
+       if (!base) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Unable to find sysc\n");

dev_dbg (see doc/develop/driver-model/design.rst)

ok


+               return -ENODEV;
+       }
+
+       priv->sysc_base = ioremap_nocache((phys_addr_t)base,
SYSC_MAP_SIZE);
+
+       /* get corresponding memc phandle */
+       ret = dev_read_phandle_with_args(dev, "mediatek,memc",
NULL, 0, 0,

should be "ralink,memctl".

ok


+                                        &args);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(args.node);
+       if (IS_ERR(regmap))
+               return PTR_ERR(regmap);

These two steps can be compined with syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle.

+       base = regmap_get_range(regmap, 0);
+       if (!base) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Unable to find memc\n");

dev_dbg

+               return -ENODEV;
+       }
+
+       priv->memc_base = ioremap_nocache((phys_addr_t)base,
MEMC_MAP_SIZE);
+
+       mt7621_get_clocks(priv);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct udevice_id mt7621_clk_ids[] = {
+       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-clk" },
+       { }
+};
+
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(mt7621_clk) = {
+       .name = "mt7621-clk",
+       .id = UCLASS_CLK,
+       .of_match = mt7621_clk_ids,
+       .probe = mt7621_clk_probe,
+       .priv_auto = sizeof(struct mt7621_clk_priv),
+       .ops = &mt7621_clk_ops,
+};
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h b/include/dt-
bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b24aef351c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 MediaTek Inc. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Author:  Weijie Gao <weijie....@mediatek.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_MT7621_CLK_H_
+#define _DT_BINDINGS_MT7621_CLK_H_
+
+/* Base clocks */
+#define CLK_MIPS_CNT                   36
+#define CLK_SYS                                35
+#define CLK_DDR                                34
+#define CLK_CPU                                33
+#define CLK_XTAL                       32

Why is there a gap?

0~31 values are bits in clock gate register, and bit 31 is unused.
values above 31 represent clock sources not defined in the gate
register.

OK, but above your check is for clock IDs less than 31. So shouldn't it
be something like

        if (clk->id > CLK_SDXC)
                return -EINVAL;


+/* Peripheral clocks */
+#define CLK_SDXC                       30
+#define CLK_CRYPTO                     29
+#define CLK_PCIE2                      26
+#define CLK_PCIE1                      25
+#define CLK_PCIE0                      24
+#define CLK_GMAC                       23
+#define CLK_UART3                      21
+#define CLK_UART2                      20
+#define CLK_UART1                      19
+#define CLK_SPI                                18
+#define CLK_I2S                                17
+#define CLK_I2C                                16
+#define CLK_NFI                                15
+#define CLK_GDMA                       14
+#define CLK_PIO                                13
+#define CLK_PCM                                11
+#define CLK_MC                         10
+#define CLK_INTC                       9
+#define CLK_TIMER                      8
+#define CLK_SPDIFTX                    7
+#define CLK_FE                         6
+#define CLK_HSDMA                      5
+
+#endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_MT7621_CLK_H_ */

This file looks very different from
include/dt-bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h in Linux. In particular, it is
backwards, the IDs are different (HSDMA is 8 in Linux but 5 here),

5 directly represents the bit in clock gate register, which means a
mapping must be done for the include/dt-bindings/clock/mt7621-clk.h
(i.e. subtract by 3) in kernel.

btw, the file in kernel is not submitted by mediatek.

I think aligning the defines with the names in the datasheet is a good
idea. Can you send a patch to Linux to update the names of the defines?

some
of the IDs are named differently (SP_DIVTX vs SPDIFTX), and there is
no
MT7621 prefix. Can you comment on these? Are they deliberate?

The name SPDIFTX comes from the MT7621 programming guide of mediatek.
Adding MT7621 seems better.
Note that
in general, numerical IDs should be kept the same between Linux and
U-Boot so we can use the same device tree. If you need to map between
logical clock ID and a position in a register, I suggest something
like

struct {
        u8 gate_bit;
} clocks {
        [CLK_HSDMA] = { .gate_bit = 5 },
};


This is a driver dedicated for u-boot, and actually only the SYS clock
is used. I believe using correct gate bit number is clearer.

It is fine to implement only the necessary functionality, but it should
be done in a way which is easy to extend in the future, and which won't
cause us compatibility problems.

Generally, I would like to preserve both source and binary compatibility
with Linux where possible. I am not sure whether they are hard
requirements, so I made a post regarding that question [1]. For now,
addressing my above comments will be fine.

--Sean

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/c670a4cc-b234-03d4-adfb-e6a8560c2...@gmail.com/T/#u

Reply via email to