On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 01:49:02PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > This change provides the possibility to build XEA (imx287 based) board > U-Boot as a single binary (without support for CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK). > > The generated u-boot.sb can be used in the factory environment to for > example perform initial setup or HW testing. > > It can be used with 'uuu' utility > (SDPS: boot -f /srv/tftp/xea/u-boot.sb) > > The board_init_ll() is used in arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/start.S, which > is utilized when CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK is disabled. > > However, when it is enabled the arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S is used, > which requires the lowlevel_init() function. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> > --- > > board/liebherr/xea/spl_xea.c | 8 ++++++++ > board/liebherr/xea/xea.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/board/liebherr/xea/spl_xea.c b/board/liebherr/xea/spl_xea.c > index 192f68fca5f..5ee561b8b78 100644 > --- a/board/liebherr/xea/spl_xea.c > +++ b/board/liebherr/xea/spl_xea.c > @@ -290,6 +290,13 @@ u32 mxs_dram_vals[] = { > 0x00000000, 0xffffffff > }; > > +/* #ifndef CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK */ > +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FRAMEWORK) > +void board_init_ll(const u32 arg, const uint32_t *resptr) > +{ > + mxs_common_spl_init(arg, resptr, iomux_setup, ARRAY_SIZE(iomux_setup)); > +} > +#else > void lowlevel_init(void) > { > struct mxs_pinctrl_regs *pinctrl_regs = > @@ -301,3 +308,4 @@ void lowlevel_init(void) > > mxs_common_spl_init(0, NULL, iomux_setup, ARRAY_SIZE(iomux_setup)); > } > +#endif > diff --git a/board/liebherr/xea/xea.c b/board/liebherr/xea/xea.c > index cd11b0ada77..685e2e26a18 100644 > --- a/board/liebherr/xea/xea.c > +++ b/board/liebherr/xea/xea.c > @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ static void init_clocks(void) > mxs_set_sspclk(MXC_SSPCLK3, 96000, 0); > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > +/* #if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD && CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK */ > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BUILD) && CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FRAMEWORK) > void board_init_f(ulong arg) > { > init_clocks();
I know checkpatch.pl has a warning, but maybe the text needs to be tweaked there slightly? Using CONFIG_IS_ENABLED here is less readable / clear than CONFIG_SPL_BUILD (which is special) and CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK (there's no CONFIG_FRAMEWORK and this board isn't going to use TPL). -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

