On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:57:04 +0100 Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Haiying Wang, > > In message <1290525198.1932.3.ca...@haiying-laptop> you wrote: > > > > > Please use only one such name (CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT). > > CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT is used as CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT in Makefile and header > > file. > > CONFIG_TPL_BOOT is used as CONFIG_NAND_SPL in header file. > > I'm sorry, but I have to admit that I don;t understand what you are > trying to tell me. > > Why do you need XXX when you use it as YYY? Why don't you use YYY > directly? CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT indicates that there is a NAND SPL involved, and is set in both build stages. CONFIG_NAND_SPL is set only when building the SPL code itself. When Haiying said "used as CONFIG_NAND_...", I believe she meant that the difference between these two symbols is analagous to the difference between the two NAND symbols -- not that they can be used interchangeably. I think the names need to be differentiated by more than just "_SYS", though. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
