On 28/02/2022 14:48, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 23.02.22 23:59, Simon Glass wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 11:58, Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiya...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I've also managed to somewhat fix the rest of the issues I wrote, so now >>> I can replace a FIT entry with a modified one (having a different u-boot >>> file), or replace a subentry of the FIT with an arbitrary file. >>> >>> I couldn't look at your new version much but I'll try to see how good my >>> fixes apply on top of it, will probably take me longer to patchify things. >> >> OK I'm going to send a new series with (most of) your suggested fixes >> a new patches, then my refactoring. Just need to get things through >> CI. > > What's the status here? I've just rebased over master, a simple revert > of this commit no longer works, and the regression is still present. Are > there any pending patches that fixes this and I should pick locally in > order to rebase/test my pending things?
Sorry, I didn't get enough time to work on this at all. I'm drafting up replies to Simon's series [1] now, after I'm done with those I'll try to finish and send fixes for this. [1] "binman: rockchip: Migrate from rockchip SPL_FIT_GENERATOR script" https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20220223230040.159317-1-...@chromium.org/T/
