On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:49:43 +0200
Pali Rohár <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wednesday 02 March 2022 13:37:25 Marek Behún wrote:
> > On Wed,  2 Mar 2022 12:47:52 +0100
> > Pali Rohár <[email protected]> wrote:
> >   
> > > BootROM maps SPI Flash to fixed address 0xD4000000 and this mapping is
> > > active also when BootROM is executing binary kwbimage headers, which
> > > includes also U-Boot SPL.
> > > 
> > > Therefore no initialization code is required to access SPI Flags from
> > > U-Boot SPL. In proper U-Boot it is remapped to other location.
> > > 
> > > So in mvebu implementation of env_sf_get_env_addr() function returns
> > > 0xD4000000 when running in SPL and NULL when in proper U-Boot.
> > > 
> > > This change would allow to use U-Boot ENV in U-Boot SPL. Normally it is 
> > > not
> > > possible to read ENV because it is too big and U-Boot SPL does not have
> > > such big malloc() pool to real all ENV variables.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  board/CZ.NIC/turris_omnia/turris_omnia.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/board/CZ.NIC/turris_omnia/turris_omnia.c 
> > > b/board/CZ.NIC/turris_omnia/turris_omnia.c
> > > index 33cec6587e19..a93af6c5b877 100644
> > > --- a/board/CZ.NIC/turris_omnia/turris_omnia.c
> > > +++ b/board/CZ.NIC/turris_omnia/turris_omnia.c
> > > @@ -243,6 +243,16 @@ static bool omnia_detect_sata(void)
> > >   return stsword & MSATA_IND_STSBIT ? true : false;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +void *env_sf_get_env_addr(void)
> > > +{
> > > + /* SPI Flash is mapped to address 0xD4000000 only in SPL */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> > > + return (void *)0xD4000000 + CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET;
> > > +#else
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +#endif  
> > 
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD))
> >     return (void *)0xD4000000 + CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET;
> > else
> >     return NULL;
> > 
> > Marek  
> 
> This does not work. CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET is not defined.
> 
> All this code needs to be filtered out via preprocessor.

OK.

In that case:

Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <[email protected]>

Reply via email to