On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:18:41PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> it is more then a month where my colleague sent 2 series for adding support 
> for
> ospi to cadence qspi driver without any reaction from a spi maintainer.
> 
> Here are links to that series
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220512100535.16364-1-ashok.reddy.s...@xilinx.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1653455832-14763-1-git-send-email-ashok.reddy.s...@xilinx.com/
> 
> That's why I have created one branch and push it to my repo to run CI loop.
> There is no issue that's why I think that patches should be merged.
> 
> If you recommend to go different way please let me know.

I wish I had a better idea, but this seems overall reasonable, thanks
for your patience.

> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit d61c11b8c894fad517677dc51ee82d1eade39c01:
> 
>   Merge branch '2022-06-28-mpc85xx-and-aspeed-fixes' into next (2022-06-28
> 10:52:00 -0400)
> 
> are available in the Git repository at:
> 
>   g...@source.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-microblaze.git
> tags/versal-qspi-for-v2022.10
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 2c27fdc0705251f594ecee3de0ea195ea421e05e:
> 
>   spi: cadence-qspi: Fix programming ospi flash speed (2022-06-29 16:00:31 
> +0200)
> 

Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to