Hi Simon,

Am 13.07.2022 um 17:28 schrieb Simon Glass:
Hi Stefan,

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 12:31, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
<stefan.herbrechtsmeier-...@weidmueller.com> wrote:

Hi Simon,

Am 12.07.2022 um 12:58 schrieb Simon Glass:
Hi Stefan,

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 07:22, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
<stefan.herbrechtsmeier-...@weidmueller.com> wrote:

From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsme...@weidmueller.com>

Add functions to read 8/16-bit integers like the existing functions for
32/64-bit to simplify read of 8/16-bit integers from device tree
properties.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsme...@weidmueller.com>
---

   arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts |  2 ++
   drivers/core/of_access.c  | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++
   drivers/core/ofnode.c     | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   drivers/core/read.c       | 21 +++++++++++++
   include/dm/of_access.h    | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
   include/dm/ofnode.h       | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
   include/dm/read.h         | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   test/dm/test-fdt.c        | 19 ++++++++++++
   8 files changed, 279 insertions(+)

This looks good but is very expensive in terms of code size. Can you
update your u8 and u16 functions to reuse the existing u32 function
and just convert the value?

The u32 function requires a 32 bit value inside the device tree because
it checks the size and maybe swap the bytes.

The u8 and u16 function requires only a 8 and 16 bit value inside the
device tree.

Yes that's true. What is the use case for these functions?

The usb251xb driver requires this functions [1]. The usb251xb device tree binding [2] defines the ids as 16 bit values and the Linux driver use 8 bit for an unspecified property. Without this changes the driver doesn't satisfy the specification and is incompatible to the Linux driver.

[1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2022-June/486424.html
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb251xb.txt

Regards
  Stefan

Reply via email to