Am 12/23/2010 07:47 PM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: > Le 23/12/2010 19:25, Michael Schwingen a écrit : > >> OK. It seems the interrupt code is more broken than I thought - the >> udelay implementation relies on a variable that is set *before* >> relocation - in BSS. > And the non-interrupt code does not? No. After the rewrite, the code does delay-to-timer-tic conversion and uses the timebase counter in the IXP (which always counts up, with a fixed rate, and has an overflow flag) to do the timing.
cu Michael _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
