On 10/3/22 18:44, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 10:08, Heinrich Schuchardt
<[email protected]> wrote:
riscv32 needs a different toolchain than riscv64
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]>
---
v4:
no change
v3:
new patch
---
tools/buildman/boards.py | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/buildman/boards.py b/tools/buildman/boards.py
index 8a0971aa40..cdc4d9ffd2 100644
--- a/tools/buildman/boards.py
+++ b/tools/buildman/boards.py
@@ -263,6 +263,17 @@ class KconfigScanner:
if params['arch'] == 'arm' and params['cpu'] == 'armv8':
params['arch'] = 'aarch64'
+ # fix-up for riscv
+ if params['arch'] == 'riscv':
+ try:
+ value = self._conf.syms.get('ARCH_RV32I').str_value
+ except:
+ value = ''
+ if value == 'y':
+ params['arch'] = 'riscv32'
+ else:
+ params['arch'] = 'riscv64'
+
return params
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
I think I understand this better. Can we detect a boards.cfg file
which needs updating? Or perhaps the existing output_is_new() function
is good enough?
output_is_new() only checks the change date of files called *_defconfig,
Kconfig*, MAINTAINERS. You could check the date of file boards.py too.
Best regards
Heinrich
