On 10/13/22 18:12, Marek Behún wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:13:11 +0200
Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> wrote:
Builiding with GCC 12.2 fails:
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c: In function 'fdt_fixup_liodn_tbl_fman':
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c:340:35: error: the comparison will
always evaluate as 'false' for the address of 'compat'
will never be NULL [-Werror=address]
340 | if (tbl[i].compat == NULL)
|
Remove the superfluous check.
Fixes: 97a8d010e029 ("net/fman: Support both new and legacy FMan Compatibles")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c
index a084002494..2d55916841 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c
@@ -337,9 +337,6 @@ static void fdt_fixup_liodn_tbl_fman(void *blob,
for (i = 0; i < sz; i++) {
int off;
- if (tbl[i].compat == NULL)
- continue;
-
/* Try the new compatible first.
* If the node is missing, try the old.
*/
This is the wrong fix, IMO. Instead we should do something like
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c
index a084002494..41b7d53ec3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/liodn.c
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static void fdt_fixup_liodn_tbl_fman(void *blob,
for (i = 0; i < sz; i++) {
int off;
- if (tbl[i].compat == NULL)
+ if (tbl[i].compat[0] == NULL)
continue;
/* Try the new compatible first.
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static void fdt_fixup_liodn_tbl_fman(void *blob,
*/
off = fdt_node_offset_by_compat_reg(blob,
tbl[i].compat[0], tbl[i].compat_offset);
- if (off < 0)
+ if (off < 0 && tbl[i].compat[1] != NULL)
off = fdt_node_offset_by_compat_reg(blob,
tbl[i].compat[1], tbl[i].compat_offset);
There are two orthogonal changes here:
* removing a superfluous check.
* adding new ones
According to your review there seems to be nothing wrong in removing the
old check.
But if you think that a check of compat[i] is needed and you prefer to
create a patch combining both changes, please, go ahead.
Best regards
Heinrich