On 01/08/2011 02:04 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit : >> From: seedshope<bocui...@gmail.com> >> >> Remove u-boot-nand.lds from board/samsung/smdk6400 and >> use the common u-boot.lds of arm1176 cpu layer. This >> patch also fix the building errors: >> >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/libs3c64xx.o: In function `mem_ctrl_asm_init': >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/cpu_init.S:32: multiple definition of >> `mem_ctrl_asm_init' >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/cpu_init.S:32: first defined here >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.o: In function `_rel_dyn_start_ofs': >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S:379: undefined reference to `__rel_dyn_start' >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.o: In function `_rel_dyn_end_ofs': >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S:379: undefined reference to `__rel_dyn_end' >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.o: In function `_dynsym_start_ofs': >> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S:379: undefined reference to `__dynsym_start' >> >> Signed-off-by: seedshope<bocui...@googlemail.com> > In the current u-boot-arm tree, board/samsung/smdk6400/u-boot-nand.lds > and arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/u-boot.lds are identical; I am thus ok with the > change in itself since the board lds file was useless, but I am not sure > the description is valid. Can you double-check this change wrt to the > link issue? I am sure the link issue. But I need to adjust the patch. I should be modify base on board/samsung/smdk6400/u-boot-nand.lds, Don't delete it. > Amicalement,
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot