On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 17:32:11 +0100
Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mentioned function result is always true and result isn't checked
> anyway. Let's make it void.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>

Cheers,
Andre

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c
> index bf5b4ddfb5c2..3b2ba168498c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static bool mctl_phy_write_training(struct dram_para 
> *para)
>       return result;
>  }
>  
> -static bool mctl_phy_bit_delay_compensation(struct dram_para *para)
> +static void mctl_phy_bit_delay_compensation(struct dram_para *para)
>  {
>       u32 *ptr;
>       int i;
> @@ -683,8 +683,6 @@ static bool mctl_phy_bit_delay_compensation(struct 
> dram_para *para)
>  
>               setbits_le32(SUNXI_DRAM_PHY0_BASE + 0x54, 0x80);
>       }
> -
> -     return true;
>  }
>  
>  static bool mctl_phy_init(struct dram_para *para)

Reply via email to