在 2023-01-03星期二的 17:38 +0000，Andre Przywara写道：
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2022 13:55:02 +0800
> Icenowy Zheng <u...@icenowy.me> wrote:
>
> Hi Icenowy,
>
> > 在 2022-12-06星期二的 00:45 +0000，Andre Przywara写道：
> > > This adds the basic SoC .dtsi devicetree stub for the Allwinner
> > > T113s
> > > SoC. This shares a die with the Allwinner D1 SoC (with RISC-V
> > > cores),
> > > but uses two Cortex-A7 cores instead of the T-HEAD C906 RISC-V
> > > core.
> > >
> > > Include the existing D1 devicetree stub, but add the ARM specific
> > > nodes,
> > > like for the CPU, the arch timer and the GIC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/dts/sun8i-t113s.dtsi | 59
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/sun8i-t113s.dtsi
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/sun8i-t113s.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/sun8i-
> > > t113s.dtsi
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..0919ce559f6
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/sun8i-t113s.dtsi
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ or MIT)
> > > +// Copyright (C) 2022 Arm Ltd.
> > > +
> > > +#define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(nr) GIC_SPI nr
> > > +
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > > +#include <../../riscv/dts/sunxi-d1s-t113.dtsi>
> >
> > Should we make a R528 DTSI which includes d1-t113.dtsi, and then
> > T113
> > DTSI which includes d1s-t113.dtsi ?
>
> If I understand Samuel correctly, the T113-s includes the DSP, in
> contrast
> to the D1s, which has fused that off.
> That would make including both sunxi-d1*-t113.dtsi files the right
> choice,
> wouldn't it? According to Samuel's list, sunxi-d1-t113.dtsi contains
> DSP
> related peripherals.
Okay, although I heard that the DSP is not fused off (because DSP RAM
is used by BROM).
>
> I don't know if there is anything DT relevant that the R528 has over
> the
> T113-s, but I don't claim to provide an R528 DT anyway, at least not
> yet,
> so we can leave this for the future, should a board or manual emerge.
>
> So this file here should to be the equivalent of sun20i-d1s.dtsi,
> providing the ARM specific bits.
>
> Does that make sense? If you agree, I would post this to Linux ASAP.
It sounds good.
>
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
>
> > > +#include <../../riscv/dts/sunxi-d1-t113.dtsi>
> > > +
> > > +/ {
> > > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > > +
> > > + cpus {
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > + cpu0: cpu@0 {
> > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> > > + device_type = "cpu";
> > > + reg = <0>;
> > > + clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
> > > + clock-names = "cpu";
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + cpu1: cpu@1 {
> > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> > > + device_type = "cpu";
> > > + reg = <1>;
> > > + clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
> > > + clock-names = "cpu";
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + gic: interrupt-controller@1c81000 {
> > > + compatible = "arm,gic-400";
> > > + reg = <0x03021000 0x1000>,
> > > + <0x03022000 0x2000>,
> > > + <0x03024000 0x2000>,
> > > + <0x03026000 0x2000>;
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4)
> > > |
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> > > + interrupt-controller;
> > > + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + timer {
> > > + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4)
> > > |
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> > > + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4)
> > > |
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> > > + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4)
> > > |
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> > > + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4)
> > > |
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + pmu {
> > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-pmu";
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 172 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > > + <GIC_SPI 173 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > + interrupt-affinity = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>;
> > > + };
> > > +};
> >
>
