On 2/13/23 02:46, Chunfeng Yun (云春峰) wrote:
On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 11:32 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 2/10/23 09:33, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
[...]
@@ -50,6 +50,27 @@
#define IPPC_U3_CTRL(p) (IPPC_U3_CTRL_0P + ((p) * 0x08))
#define IPPC_U2_CTRL(p) (IPPC_U2_CTRL_0P + ((p) * 0x08))
+/* xHCI CSR */
+#define LS_EOF_CFG 0x930
+#define LSEOF_OFFSET 0x89
+
+#define FS_EOF_CFG 0x934
+#define FSEOF_OFFSET 0x2e
+
+#define SS_GEN1_EOF_CFG 0x93c
+#define SSG1EOF_OFFSET 0x78
+
+#define HFCNTR_CFG 0x944
+#define ITP_DELTA_CLK (0xa << 1)
+#define ITP_DELTA_CLK_MASK GENMASK(5, 1)
+#define FRMCNT_LEV1_RANG (0x12b << 8)
Look at FIELD_PREP() macro, that should let you avoid the (0x12b <<
8) .
Seems not use FIELD_PREP() macro here.
It's not a mask, it's the value set in below mask
FRMCNT_LEV1_RANG_MASK.
So that would be
FIELD_PREP(FRMCNT_LEV1_RANG_MASK, 0x12b)
I think ?
+#define FRMCNT_LEV1_RANG_MASK GENMASK(19, 8)
+
+#define SS_GEN2_EOF_CFG 0x990
+#define SSG2EOF_OFFSET 0x3c
+
+#define XSEOF_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(11, 0)
[...]
@@ -308,6 +354,7 @@ static int xhci_mtk_remove(struct udevice *dev)
static const struct udevice_id xhci_mtk_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mtk-xhci" },
+ { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-xhci" },
Is the extra compatible string really needed, can't the driver match
on
the generic one ?
These settings are a workaround only for mt8195 to fix HW issue, can't
use generic compatible.
Ah, I see, OK
