On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 04:16:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Update this to use the PPL condition instead, so that nothing changes when > building for SPL with split config. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > --- > > (no changes since v1) > > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c > index 5b5a81a255d..b09b898051b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ phys_addr_t socfpga_clkmgr_base __section(".data"); > phys_addr_t socfpga_rstmgr_base __section(".data"); > phys_addr_t socfpga_sysmgr_base __section(".data"); > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_L2_PL310 > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPL_SYS_L2_PL310 > static const struct pl310_regs *const pl310 = > (struct pl310_regs *)CFG_SYS_PL310_BASE; > #endif > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ void enable_caches(void) > #endif > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_L2_PL310 > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPL_SYS_L2_PL310 > void v7_outer_cache_enable(void) > { > struct udevice *dev;
Why can we not continue to use CONFIG_SYS_L2_PL310 in this case? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature