Hi Tom, On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 12:01, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:58:37AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 11:56, Jonas Karlman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 2023-02-22 19:24, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:19:03AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > > >> On 2023-02-21, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > > >>> On 2023-02-21, Simon Glass wrote: > > > >>>> This board has moved to standard boot but the old 'distro_bootcmd' > > > >>>> command is still active. Disable DISTRO_DEFAULTS to fix this. > > > >>> > > > >>> Works for booting rockpro64-rk3399, thanks! > > > >> > > > >> I can also confirm that applying a very similar patch for > > > >> pinebook-pro-rk3399 works booting with bootstd. > > > >> > > > >> Seems worth adding if there is a v2 of the patch series. > > > >> > > > >> Alternately, rather than doing this on a board-by-board basis, is there > > > >> some way to disable CONFIG_DISTRO_DEFAULTS when a board is using > > > >> BOOTSTD? > > > > > > > > I think that's possibly a bit dangerous? DISTRO_DEFAULTS and > > > > BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS need to be reconciled to a single new symbol, and the > > > > DISTRO_DEFAULTS method of select not imply for most things is also I > > > > suspect the right path. > > > > > > > > > > Another option would be to set BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND=y, this is the main > > > issue with rk3399 at the moment, distro_bootcmd got removed from env, > > > yet bootcmd is still "run distro_bootcmd" due to DISTRO_DEFAULTS=y. > > > > > > > > > config BOOTCOMMAND > > > default "bootflow scan -lb" if BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND && > > > CMD_BOOTFLOW_FULL > > > default "bootflow scan" if BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND && > > > !CMD_BOOTFLOW_FULL > > > default "run distro_bootcmd" if !BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND && > > > DISTRO_DEFAULTS > > > > > > config BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND > > > default y if !DISTRO_DEFAULTS > > > > That seems reasonable to me, along with a 'depends on BOOTSTD' > > > > At present DISTRO_DEFAULTS is both enabled in defconfig files (about > > 350) and Kconfig (another 300). For rockchip it is the latter. > > > > It doesn't really make sense to use DISTRO_DEFAULTS when using > > BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS. One is 'run distro_bootcmd' and the other is > > 'bootflow scan', possibly with -lb flags. But we really don't want > > people flipping back and forward. > > It doesn't make linguistic sense to have "distro defaults" and "bootstd > defaults" enabled. It makes compute sense to have these two symbols > combined as they're nearly identical and have a similar conceptual need > (make sure we have things like bootz/booti/ext4/etc support).
Oh, so you are talking about DISTRO_DEFAULTS, not the actual command? In that case I can do a patch to make them both use a common symbol to bring in most stuff, although bootstd does not need hush and a few other things that are needed by distro_bootcmd. Let me know if that makes sense. Regards, Simon
