Hi Pali, On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:58 PM Pali Rohár <p...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 February 2023 21:45:07 Tony Dinh wrote: > > Hi Pali, > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 3:14 PM Pali Rohár <p...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 21 February 2023 15:06:16 Tony Dinh wrote: > > > > Hi Pali, > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:22 PM Pali Rohár <p...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This patch series contains various improvements and fixes for existing > > > > > logical errors. Boot phase was adjusted to match behavior of Armada > > > > > 385 > > > > > BootROM by inspecting and disassembling of BootROM binary dump itself. > > > > > Important information are included in documentation patch for kwboot. > > > > > Most of the changes are untested, hence this patch series is just RFC. > > > > > So please test changes before applying, idealy on SPI, SATA and > > > > > SD/MMC. > > > > > Nevertheless all patches on github passed CI testing in this PR: > > > > > https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/275 > > > ... > > > > I went to patchwork and downloaded the series. > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230221201925.9644-2-p...@kernel.org > > > > > > > > When I applied the patches set there were some rejections. > > > > <BEGIN LOG> > > > > # patch -p1 < > > > > /usr/src/builds-u-boot-marvell/pali_patches/arm-mvebu-Various-fixes.patch > > > > > > > ... > > > FAILED > > > ... > > > > <END LOG> > > > > > > > > I'm on the latest master branch (just did a git pull today). Could > > > > some patches be out of order? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tony > > > > > > Well, that is because DENX mail server is broken and it crashed during > > > processing antispam filter on my some of my patches. So some patches are > > > missing in archive and then applying dependent patches failed. > > > > > > So ignore patchwork and email patches. Rather fetch changes from the > > > mentioned github pull request https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/275 > > > > > > You can do it via git command (it fetch it to the new mvebu branch): > > > > > > git fetch https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot.git refs/pull/275/merge:mvebu > > > > Indeed! That pull request was applied without problem. > > > > So I did a general regression test running rebuilt kwboot binary, and > > rebuilt u-boot images for these 2 Marvell boards: > > > > Thecus N2350 (Armada 385) > > Pogo V4 (Kirkwood 88F6192). > > > > So for that part: > > Tested-by: Tony Dinh <mibo...@gmail.com> > > > > All the best, > > Tony > > Thanks for testing! Anyway do you have some A38x board which can boot > from SD/MMC, SATA or NAND? This is what is needed to test too. I see > that Pogo boots from NAND but it does not use SPL.
I have only one A38x board with NAND: the Thecus N2350. I am creating a new defconfig and will see if I can boot it from the NAND flash. By the way, I'm having this build error that CFG_SYS_NAND_BASE is not defined. What should it be for A38x? is it the same for Kirkwood? All the best, Tony
