On 01.03.23 18:26, Andrew Davis wrote: > On 2/28/23 12:19 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> From: Su Baocheng <[email protected]> >> >> Due to different signature keys, the PG1 and the PG2 boards can no >> longer use the same FSBL (tiboot3). This makes it impossible anyway to >> maintaine a single flash.bin for both variants, so we can also split the >> build. >> > > Having two defconfigs just to make the small changes needed will be > more burden than it saves. Keeping them in sync and having your integration > layer do two different builds just adds more work than it is worth IMHO. > > We (TI) are going in that direction for our HS boards and combining the > defconfigs back together now. The solution is to have the one defconfig > build both images, one for HS and one for non-HS. For you looks like you > are already calling the two PG boot images differently so this should work > (seboot_pg1.bin and seboot_pg2.bin). Just add a new full entry in > boot-image.dtsi for each (vs that #ifdef check changing the output name).
How should that work? Will we somehow get two flash.bin out of a single build then? Jan -- Siemens AG, Technology Competence Center Embedded Linux
