On Wednesday 05 April 2023 00:33:02 Marek Vasut wrote: > On 4/5/23 00:16, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 April 2023 00:11:17 Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On 4/4/23 21:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 04 April 2023 20:05:15 Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > The eMMC HW partition 0 and 7 both mean USER HW partition. > > > > > > > > This is not truth! > > > > > > Can you please provide further details to back your claim ? > > > > Yes, see a patch with explanation which I meanwhile sent: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > > This very much adds a comment that looks like the content of the second > paragraph of my reply, see below. > > It is a good thing you mention the aforementioned patch, since exactly one > line past the changes you implemented is the following piece of code: > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/common/spl/spl_mmc.c#L382 > > " > int default_spl_mmc_emmc_boot_partition(struct mmc *mmc) > ... > part = (mmc->part_config >> 3) & PART_ACCESS_MASK; > if (part == 7) > part = 0; > " > > Which maps 7 to 0 . > > > > This kind of screaming feedback with zero additional information is > > > worthless, sorry. Before you proceed with any further replies, please > > > have a > > > look at JEDEC JESD84-B51 section 7.4.69 PARTITION_CONFIG Bit[5:3] > > > BOOT_PARTITION_ENABLE , this is what is being discussed here. Value 1/2 is > > > either BOOT HW partition, value 0/7 is treated as USER HW partition by the > > > boot code. > > Please read the paragraph above, I do not see any reply to it and I think > that might put the conversation back on track.
I have read it and the reply with explanation is already there in my first email and also in the linked email. What you have written above in not truth.
